Church and Diaconia as Social Systems

Authors

  • Godwin Gladson Delase Ampony Vereinte Evangelische Mission - Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47900/48wh6p34

Keywords:

Social System, Diaconia, Church, Religion, Spiritual

Abstract

The article "Church and Diaconia as Social Systems" explores applying Niklas Luhmann's social systems theory to religious institutions, particularly the Church and its diaconal functions. It presents the Church as a self-regulating system that provides spiritual, moral, and social leadership while interacting with political, economic, and legal systems. Similarly, Diaconia, defined as the Church’s service-oriented mission, is examined as an autonomous social system focused on welfare, advocacy, and justice. The Church and Diaconia are analysed for their functional differentiations, complexities, and communication patterns. This article draws light on the evolution of the practice of Diaconia from traditionally charity-oriented to justice-focused and examines its actions in addressing global crises, such as poverty, diseases, climate change, education, food insecurity, and migration. Integrating theological reflection with social systems theory is not just a mere addition. However, it provides a comprehensive framework that allows the paper to offer a deep understanding of the Church's and Diaconia's evolving roles in modern society.

References

Beukes, Jacques Walter, and Laurika Elouise Beukes. 2023. “Proposing a Social Justice Approach to Diaconia for a South African Context.” Religions 14 (5): 668. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14050668.

Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595-616.

Conrad, Charles. 1988. “Identity, Structure and Communicative Action in Church Decision-Making.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 27 (3): 345. https://doi.org/10.2307/1387374.

Grudem, Wayne A. 1994. Systematic theology: An introduction to biblical doctrine. Making Sense of Series. Leicester England, Grand Rapids Mich. Inter-Varsity Press; Zondervan Pub. House. Accessed December 22, 2024. https://books.google.de/books?id=he-Ax9CoYpIC.

Gruijters, Rochus-Antonin. 2016. “Solidarity, the Common Good and Social Justice in the Catholic Social Teaching within the Framework of Globalization.” Philosophia Reformata 81 (1): 14–31. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26547892.

Knoetze, Hannes. 2019. “Diaconia as a sustainable form of transformation and development amongst emerging adults in a globalised South Africa.” Practical Theology 12 (2): 208–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1756073X.2019.1597489.

Luhmann, N. 2013. A Systems Theory of Religion. Cultural Memory in the Present. Stanford Calif. Stanford University Press. Accessed December 22, 2024. https://books.google.de/books?id=pHV4swK3y_AC.

Luhmann, Niklas. 1995. Social Systems. Writing science. Stanford Calif. Stanford University Press.

Mettang, Olivia, and Eva-Maria Euchner. 2023. “Christian churches and social welfare in secular times: How goal congruence shapes religious involvement in morality-based social services.” Politics and Religion 16 (2): 266–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175504832200030X.

Öhlmann, Philipp. 2023. “Diaconia and Development: The Study of Religious Social Practice as Lead Discipline in the Religion and Development Debate.” Religions 14 (8): 1032. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14081032.

Ozsungur, Fahri. 2023. “Conflict Management in Social Work.” AJBSR 20 (5): 619–22. https://doi.org/10.34297/AJBSR.2023.20.002761.

Riviș-Tipei, Iosif. 2023. “The Role of Religion in Contemporary Society – Mapping a Research Itinerary.” 7 (2). https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.10206899.

van Rooy, David L., and Chockalingam Viswesvaran. 2004. “Emotional intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation of predictive validity and nomological net.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 65 (1): 71–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00076-9.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Church and Diaconia as Social Systems. (2024). The New Perspective in Theology and Religious Studies, 5(2), 247-271. https://doi.org/10.47900/48wh6p34